The new generation needs the opportunity to develop its own positions; the organisation needs clarity about which decisions apply today and which will be made later. A published case study describes a specific generational change. Its results remain tied to that case. For each new family, the process is derived from its ownership, leadership and business situation, not from a transferred standard plan.
Nachfolgerolle und Rückzug gemeinsam vorbereiten: Die fachliche Auswahl und Qualifizierung der Nachfolge werden mit dem künftigen Führungsteam und dem Rückzug der übergebenden Generation verbunden. Verantwortlichkeiten, Entscheidungsspielräume und Formen der weiteren Mitwirkung benötigen klare Vereinbarungen. Geeignete Gespräche und Entwicklungssettings unterstützen die Bearbeitung dieser unterschiedlichen Rollen.
Arbeitsergebnisse: Geklärte Ebenen und Rollen des Übergangs; Gemeinsames Zukunftsbild und Anforderungen an die Nachfolge; Abgestimmte Schritte für Übergabe und Entwicklung.
Legal and tax structuring requires the relevant specialists. Our consulting brief covers strategy, roles, development and collaboration.
A generational change often raises simultaneous questions: what should be retained from the existing business model? Which decisions may the new leadership make independently? How does the role of the previous generation change? What expectations do employees, customers and family members have? We treat these questions as an interconnected process.
We first disclose who is responsible for which decision and separate the family discussion from the organisational implementation. Then the future direction of the company is linked to the capabilities and relationships of the new leadership. A handover can have stages in which responsibility grows and experiences are evaluated together. The specific phases are derived from the mandate, ownership structure and business.
Understandable communication within the company is important: employees need to know which decisions already apply and where the future leadership is only just developing a position. The published case study on generational change shows a specific case. However, its processes and results remain specific to that company. For a new mandate, they are a source of ideas, not a schedule to be copied.
The preparation also involves key people outside the family if their work is important for continuity. Their knowledge of customers, processes and informal decision paths can help to understand the consequences of a new leadership role. The circle is agreed with the family so that confidential ownership questions remain protected. During the handover, it is checked whether new responsibilities are actually being used or whether decisions continue to return automatically to the previous generation. Such observations indicate a role clarification that is still open, not merely communication errors.
Regular reflection makes visible whether the agreed responsibility actually reaches the successor leadership.
Handing over and taking over must be shaped at the same time. The previous generation needs a clarified future role; the successor needs a mandate that can actually be lived in everyday work. Together with those involved, we make visible which decisions are already made jointly, which will be made alone in future and which within the circle of owners. This makes contradictory expectations workable before they recur in daily individual decisions. A possible development phase of the succession is linked to concrete tasks and feedback.
At the same time, the company needs to know how leadership and responsibility are organised during the transition. The result is an agreed sequence of decisions, roles and observation points. Tax and legal questions are handled by the relevant specialists and coordinated with the process. Open points remain documented with responsibility and the next conversation, instead of continuing to have a hidden effect in everyday work.