For some families, a shared vision of the future comes first; in other cases, a specific handover needs to be prepared. Results can be agreed guidelines, clarified roles and a process for decisions still open. A published case on generational change shows the practical connection between the levels; its project-specific statements are in the case study and are not promised here as a general success.
Familie gemeinsam entscheidungsfähig machen: Wenn Interessen, Werte und Ziele auseinanderliegen, kann eine Unternehmerfamilie ihre Entscheidungsfähigkeit verlieren. Der im Leistungsportfolio beschriebene Prozess sammelt Sichtweisen, bezieht Gefühle ein und klärt Bedürfnisse. Anschließend entwickeln die Beteiligten Handlungsoptionen, treffen eine gemeinsam getragene Entscheidung und begleiten deren Umsetzung.
Gesellschafterverantwortung vorbereiten: Gesellschafterqualifikation verbindet Unternehmensstrategie, Organisationsdesign und Familien-Governance. Sie vermittelt Zusammenhänge zu Konflikten, unterschiedlichen Grundhaltungen in Unternehmerfamilien und zur Unternehmensnachfolge. Welche Kenntnisse und Fähigkeiten erforderlich sind, ergibt sich aus der konkreten Gesellschafterrolle.
Arbeitsergebnisse: Gemeinsame Ziele und Erwartungen der Unternehmerfamilie; Geklärte Rollen und Entscheidungsregeln; Grundlage für Familiencharta und regelmäßigen Austausch.
Organisational and family matters are coordinated with legal and tax advice where needed.
The family and the company need different spaces for conversation about succession. In the family, it is about expectations regarding ownership, responsibility and belonging. In the company, it is about leadership, strategy and the reliability of decisions. These levels influence each other but should not be dissolved into one another. Together with those involved, we clarify which questions are decided within the family circle and where management or external leadership should be involved.
A shared frame of orientation can help to name explicitly different ideas about the role of the next generation. Not every person has to be operationally active to have legitimate questions about the future of the company. At the same time, a family expectation must not unnoticed become an organisational requirement. The results are documented in such a way that they support the further strategic and succession-related steps: clarified responsibilities, decisions still open, agreed conversation formats and a picture of the desired connection between family and business. The published generational change case shows one possible form, but does not replace a separate clarification of the mandate.
For the family, it can be helpful to record one distinction explicitly: a person can be an owner without taking on an operational leadership role. Another can lead the company without deciding alone on long-term ownership questions. These roles are linked to succession and future strategy. We translate them into understandable contribution expectations and decision paths. Where there is not yet agreement, the question is documented as open and a suitable follow-up conversation is agreed. This provides orientation without concealing a conflict through premature wording.
The clarification becomes very concrete. We ask about the history and identity of the family, written and unwritten rules, shared values, family and business goals, and roles in ownership and leadership. The question of whether “family first” or “business first” should apply in the event of conflict is also asked explicitly; the family must understand the consequences of its choice.
An inventory can give rise to a jointly formulated family strategy with a preamble, principles and rules for future decisions. We apply this structure only insofar as it suits the respective family. A charter is helpful if it records genuine agreement; it does not replace conversation about unresolved expectations or how conflicts are handled going forward.