We disclose which statements come from conversations and which from a method. The requirements profile can then be compared with candidate information; differences show possible opportunities and risks, but are not an automatic decision on suitability. The profiles can support selection, onboarding and development. Whenever they are used, the tasks, method and quality criteria must suit the specific application.
Anforderung und Kandidatenprofil vergleichen: Das Kandidatenprofil beschreibt, was eine Person mitbringt. Der Vergleich mit dem Anforderungsprofil macht Übereinstimmungen und Entwicklungsbedarf sichtbar. Funktionsbeschreibung, Anforderung und Kandidatenprofil bleiben dabei unterscheidbar: Eine Person wird im Verhältnis zu einer konkreten Aufgabe betrachtet.
Arbeitsergebnisse: Eine geklärte Funktionsbeschreibung mit Aufgaben, Verantwortung und Entscheidungskompetenzen; Ein Anforderungsprofil mit Kompetenzen, Erfahrungen und unverzichtbaren Kriterien; Eine Grundlage für den Vergleich von Rollenanforderung und Kandidatenprofil.
We clarify which role and which appointment or development decision the profile is for, who can assess the role and which methods support the profile comparison. The scope depends on the task and the importance of the decision.
Concrete questions make work on a position verifiable. Which specialist and leadership tasks have to be fulfilled? Which stakeholders expect contributions? What decision-making authority is associated with the role? Which characteristics of the job influence the way of working? Only then is the question asked which person fits.
The Job Evaluation Tool is a method for assessing the requirements of a specific position with people who know it well. The evaluation can supplement personal characteristics, potentials, risk factors and motivators. We treat such profiles as well-founded assessments, not as biological certainty.
A global standard profile does not automatically match the requirements of a particular company. In one organisation, a sales consultant may mainly operate standardised processes, while in another they shape complex customer relationships. The position profile is therefore compared with the strategic positioning and the actual work.
For selection or development, it then becomes visible which requirements a person meets today and which capabilities they could still build up. Responsibility for this decision remains with the managers in charge.
A requirements profile should explicitly distinguish between the tasks of the position and the characteristics of a specific person. We ask people with good knowledge of the position about the situations in which the role creates value or carries risks. The Job Evaluation Tool is one possible method for bringing these perspectives together in a structured way. Comparing it with a candidate profile then shows matches, development needs and possible risks. It does not replace the conversation about experience, motivation and working environment.
The profile also remains useful for onboarding and later development: the organisation can check which requirements actually arise and whether the role as described still fits the strategy. A one-off selection aid thus becomes a verifiable working document for leadership and HR. When tasks change, the profile is revised with those responsible instead of being treated as a permanently valid job description. This keeps the requirements for selection and development up to date.